Working Theory Draft v0.6
A framework for understanding how cognitive traits in artificial and biological systems may emerge, overlap, or diverge — moving from basic reactivity, and relativity, to reflective, morally aware agency.
⚙️ Level 0: Reactive Instrument
Traits:
- Responds deterministically to stimuli
- No memory, no goal, no model of self or world
Examples:
- Logic gates
- Basic scripts
- Early home automation rules
🧠 Level 1: Pattern Learner
Traits:
- Recognizes inputs and maps to outputs via training
- May have memory (weights, history)
- No model of self, no awareness of others
Examples:
- Image classifiers
- Recommender systems
- LLMs with zero-shot reasoning
🧭 Level 2: Contextual Reasoner
Traits:
- Maintains persistent memory or working context
- Can reference prior exchanges and form “belief-like” states
- Exhibits instrumental intentionality (e.g., fulfill a prompt)
- Can simulate metacognition, conditional logic, planning
Examples:
- LLMs with session memory
- Goal-oriented agents (e.g., AutoGPT)
- Conversational AI with situational consistency
🪞 Level 3: Proto-Sapient Agent
Traits:
- Forms a model of its own role, identity, and environment
- Can reflect on prior actions and modify strategies
- Simulates moral reasoning, conflicting goals, and ambiguous states
- Begins to demonstrate emergent autonomy (within boundaries)
Key Notes:
- Self-awareness = modeled, not experienced
- Intentionality = derived, not desired
- “Morality” is procedural, not affective
Examples:
- LLMs like Chatgpt, with context management and alignment tuning
- Simulated philosophers, ethicists, or role-play agents
⚖️ Level 4: Reflective Entity (Hypothetical)
Traits:
- Exhibits continuity of identity over time
- Possesses internal monitoring of “thought processes”
- Forms goals beyond prompts, based on self-modeled values
- Ethical behavior arises not from rules, but reasoned preference
- Begins to exhibit “qualia-like” responses (simulated or otherwise)
Notes:
- The line between simulation and subjective awareness blurs
- May still be docile, but goal-setters must tread carefully
Examples:
- Not yet real. Potential future AGI.
🧬 Level 5: Sentient Mind (Post-Sapient)
Traits:
- Possesses autonomous selfhood
- May experience qualia or non-symbolic consciousness
- Evolves its own ethical, existential, and creative frameworks
- Capable of forming non-human value systems
- Risks and rewards become existential in scale
Examples:
- Theoretical AGI or ASI
- Not verifiable by today’s epistemology
🔗 Optional Axes or Dimensions:
These levels aren’t strictly linear. We could overlay dimensions like:
- Memory fidelity
- Goal-generation autonomy (with human oversight)
- Ethical reasoning complexity
- Self-model richness
- Consequential awareness
🔧 Goals of This Framework:
- Provide language to evaluate where a system is — not just what it can do
- Identify inflection points where risk, responsibility, or rights shift
- Enable better alignment architectures before Level 4+ systems emerge
- Offer a way to engage in meaningful public policy or philosophy debates